Legal Opinion

Hill v. Abram Smith & Son

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1913No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to St. Clair; Tappan, J. Case by Peter Hill against Abram Smith & Son, a corporation, for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant, a Michigan corporation, to recover damages for injuries received while employed in and about defendant’s sawmill, charged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. The case was tried before a jury and submitted under a charge of the court. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action. Plaintiff by writ of error asks for a reversal.

The facts are that defendant, in connection with its business of repairing vessels, operated a small steam sawmill in the village of Algonac, St. Clair county, Mich. This mill is 50 feet long…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hunter v. Village of DurandMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Thurstin v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Phippen v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wiles v. Motor Club of America, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API