Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Works

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1889PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury to plaintiff, caused by the negligence of the defendant. In the early part of the year 1882 the defendant, which is a corporation, finished the construction of a large mill for rolling iron and steel, located at, the intersection of Indian avenue and the “ Chicago' Road,” so called, then in the township of Springwells, a suburb of the city of Detroit. It was covered with a slate roof, the center portion of which, nearly the whole length of the building, was raised above the other portion about 10 feet, forming what is called a “…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Thurstin v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Benson v. SuarezNew York Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Springer v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Mellor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rivard v. RivardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API