Legal Opinion
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 2003No. C1-02-2140PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
In this employment dispute, appellant challenges summary judgment arguing that genuine issues of material fact exist indicating that (a) respondent Production Automation Corporation (PAC) breached its employment contract with appellant by lowering commission rates from 50% to 40%, (b) PAC breached its contract with appellant by failing to pay him commissions after his termination, (c) PAC breached implied and express covenants of good faith and fair dealing, (d) the statute of limitations does not bar appellant’s claims, (e) PAC violated the Minnesota…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Myaer v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Krutchen v. Zayo Bandwidth Northeast, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Lee v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Hamann v. Park Nicollet ClinicCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.