Legal Opinion

Folk v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1983No. CX-82-754PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Defendant Home Mutual Insurance Company (Home) appeals from a decision in favor of plaintiffs William D. Folk and George T. Folk in this suit to declare the existence of automobile liability insurance coverage. The dispositive question on appeal is whether the issue of an implied contract of insurance was raised by the pleadings or litigated by consent. Our review of the record persuades us that confusion in the presentation of the matter to the trial court requires reversal and remand with leave to the plaintiffs to move to amend their complaint.

On March 30, 1980,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Sohns v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Folk v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API