Legal Opinion

Folk v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1985No. C0-85-132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Home Mutual Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s declaratory judgment finding respondent’s car was insured by it. Appellant claims the trial court’s finding is not supported by the evidence, is contrary to law, and that the trial court erred by awarding attorney’s fees. We affirm.

FACTS

This matter arises from an auto accident on March 30, 1980. Respondents commenced a declaratory judgment action to determine their rights under an insurance policy held by George Folk. Appellant claimed the 1966 Oldsmobile respondent William Folk was driving was not an insured…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Usher v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Folk v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wondra v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Denike v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Denike v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Wondra v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API