Legal Opinion
Sohns v. Pederson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1984No. C3-84-244PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s decision on respondent Sohns’ claim that appellant Pederson sold him stolen equipment and “fraudulently, willfully and unlawfully obtained money from plaintiff [Sohns] under false pretenses.” Pederson asserted the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense.
The trial court hearing the case without a jury found for Sohns, concluding Peder-son was equitably estopped from asserting the statute of limitations. He awarded Sohns $4,620 in damages, plus pre-judgment interest of $1,531.90. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Te…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Brenner v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Albachten v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Highway Sales, Inc. v. Blue Bird Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- In re the Amended Administrative Penalty Order to Westling Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.