State ex rel. GF Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is well-settled that factual determinations are within the province of the Industrial Commission and may only be corrected by mandamus upon a showing of abuse of discretion. This principle is so well-established that only a few of the multitude of cases which so hold bear citation. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 396, 397 [23 O.O.3d 358]; and State, ex rel. Haines, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 15, 16 [58 O.O.2d 70]. We have also consistently adhered to the rule that where the record contains some evidence which supports the commission’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. PetitjeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State ex rel. Maurer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.