Legal Opinion

State ex rel. GF Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1982No. 82-504PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

It is well-settled that factual determinations are within the province of the Industrial Commission and may only be corrected by mandamus upon a showing of abuse of discretion. This principle is so well-established that only a few of the multitude of cases which so hold bear citation. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 396, 397 [23 O.O.3d 358]; and State, ex rel. Haines, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 15, 16 [58 O.O.2d 70]. We have also consistently adhered to the rule that where the record contains some evidence which supports the commission’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. PetitjeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Maurer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API