Legal Opinion

Estate of Smith v. Marasco

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2002No. 2:00-cv-05485PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, the Estate. of Robert C. Smith, Pauline Smith, Dana Smith and Wanda Smith, have brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated Robert Smith’s rights under the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. They have also brought a wrongful death claim, a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and a survival action under state law against all of the defendants.

Presently before this Court is Defendants’ Renewed and Amended Motion for…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mantz v. ChainDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  2. Grimm v. Borough of NorristownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Toth v. Bristol TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Lewis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
  5. Stocking v. Newmark Knight Frank Valuation & Advisory, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API