Legal Opinion
Grimm v. Borough of Norristown
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 2002No. 2:01-cv-00431PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Gary Grimm (“Gary Grimm”) and Grimm Brothers Realty Company (“Grimm Brothers”) have brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Borough of Norristown (“the Borough”), Charles R. Sweeney (“Sweeney”) and Thomas M. O’Donnell (“O’Donnell”) violated plaintiffs’ rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 1 They have also brought several pendent state law claims. 2 Plaintiffs also have a matter pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cheney v. CyberGuard Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Eichenlaub v. Township of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Eichenlaub v. Township Of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Bosteder v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Bosteder v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.