Legal Opinion
Bradley v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 3, 1988No. Nos. 617-85-C, 394-86-C and 477-86-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Plaintiffs in these three consolidated cases are journeymen plate printers (and their local union) currently or formerly employed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP), a bureau in the Department of the Treasury.1 They allege that *742the appropriate federal official has failed to exercise pay-fixing responsibilities established by 5 U.S.C. § 5349 and regulations of the Department of the Treasury.2 Plaintiffs seek a judgment directing defendant to institute a new wage rate and awarding back pay retroactive to April 1, 1983, prejudgment and post-judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sierra Club v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, American Mining Congress, National Coal Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Sammie Blankenship v. Secretary of Hew and the Department of HewCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Aydin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Public Citizen Health Research Group v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- National Maritime Union of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daniel Bradley v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992