Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Brock
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioners Public Citizen Health Research Group, et al., in Nos. 84-1252 and 85-1014 (hereinafter petitioners) allege that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has contemptuously and unreasonably delayed promulgation of a “Short-Term Exposure Limit” (STEL) for the toxin ethylene oxide, despite this court’s specific order in Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Tyson, 796 F.2d 1479 (D.C. Circuit 1986). This allegation places the court in a delicate position. Although the courts must never forget that our constitutional system gives the Executive Branch a certain degree of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Steelworkers of America v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Thorne G. Auchter, Assistant Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Public Citizen Health Research Group v. TysonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Farmworker Justice Fund, Inc. v. William E. Brock, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- In Re International Chemical Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- National Bank of Commerce v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1998
- Oil, Chemical And Atomic Workers Union v. Occupational Safety And Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.