Legal Opinion
Daniel Bradley v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 29, 1989No. 88-1435PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are journeymen plate printers, currently or formerly employed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) of the Department of the Treasury (DOT), and their local union (collectively, hereinafter, “printers”). Asserting entitlement under 5 U.S.C. § 5349 (1982) to back pay, they filed suit in the United States Claims Court seeking a retroactive award to April 1, 1983, or, at least, to various more recent dates. The government denied liability on the ground that its decision delaying a wage adjustment was not an abuse of its pay-fixing authority. The Claims…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Maritime Union of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- James D. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
3Cited by19 opinions
- John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Donald D. Huston v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- John McBryde v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Agwiak, Alf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Stephen Bosco, Charles L. Davis, Ray Dean Williams, John M. Wolf, and All Similarly Situated Individuals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.