National Maritime Union of America v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
In this civilian pay case we are called upon to decide whether the executive branch, pursuant to its anti-inflation program, may limit pay increases of certain prevailing rate employees to the rates of increase imposed on other federal employees by statute. Specifically, we must decide whether the phrase "as nearly as is consistent with the public interest” in the statutory provision for prevailing rate *61mariners vests the mariners’ employer agencies with the discretion to override the general purpose of the prevailing rate statute: providing parity of pay between the public and private…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Amell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- L. M. Daniels and Clayton G. Leonard v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Blaha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shimota v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Department Of The Navy v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Honorable Harold Brown, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Daniel Bradley v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- James D. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.