Legal Opinion

Western Sugar Coop. v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 13, 2015No. CV 11-3473 CBM (MANx)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING INGREDION INCORPORATED’S AND TATE & LYLE INGREDIENTS AMERICAS, INC.’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS LLP

CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant/Counter-claimant Ingredion Incorporated’s and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc.’s Motions to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ counsel, Squire Patton Boggs LLP (collectively the “Motions”). (Dkt. Nos. 232, 233.) Squire Patton Boggs LLP and Plaintiff Sugar Association oppose the Motions. (Dkt. Nos. 250, 249, 252.)

*1078I. JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1831, 1338.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  3. Markham Concepts, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016
  4. Southern Visions, LLP v. Red Diamond, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
  5. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co., California Court of Appeal, 2nd District2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API