Western Sugar Coop. v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING INGREDION INCORPORATED’S AND TATE & LYLE INGREDIENTS AMERICAS, INC.’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS LLP
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant/Counter-claimant Ingredion Incorporated’s and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc.’s Motions to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ counsel, Squire Patton Boggs LLP (collectively the “Motions”). (Dkt. Nos. 232, 233.) Squire Patton Boggs LLP and Plaintiff Sugar Association oppose the Motions. (Dkt. Nos. 250, 249, 252.)
*1078I. JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1831, 1338.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Markham Concepts, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016
- Southern Visions, LLP v. Red Diamond, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co., California Court of Appeal, 2nd District2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.