Legal Opinion

Concat Lp v. Unilever, Plc

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 7, 2004No. C 04-1396 SIPublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION, DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL

ILLSTON, District Judge.

On July 2, 2004, this Court heard argument on the following motions: defendants’ motion to stay this litigation pending arbitration or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint on grounds of forum non conveniens, lack of in personam jurisdiction, and/or failure to join indispensable parties; and plaintiffs motion to disqualify defendants’ counsel. Having carefully considered the argument of counsel…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Bill Hansen v. Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. El Camino Resources, Ltd. v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. Cayanan v. Citi Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
  5. Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API