Legal Opinion

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.

California Court of Appeal, 2nd District

Decided January 29, 2016No. B256314PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

*596INTRODUCTION

Appellant J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. (J-M) appeals from a judgment in favor of its former attorneys, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP (Sheppard Mullin). Sheppard Mullin sought recovery of attorney fees relating to litigation in which Sheppard Mullin represented J-M. Sheppard *597Mullin was disqualified from that litigation because, without obtaining informed consent from either client, Sheppard Mullin represented J-M, the defendant in the litigation, while simultaneously representing an adverse party in that case, South Tahoe Public Utility District (South Tahoe), in…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HAWKINS VS. DIST. CT. (GGP MEADOWS MALL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  2. HAWKINS VS. DIST. CT. (GGP MEADOWS MALL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API