Legal Opinion

Markham Concepts, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided July 22, 2016No. C.A. No. 15-419 SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Hasbro, Ine.’s Motion to Disqualify Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Louis M. Solomon, and Michael S. Lazaroff (“Motion”). (ECF No. 75.) In March 2016, Solomon and Lazaroff, two of Markham Concepts, Inc. and Lorraine Markham’s (collectively “Markham”) attorneys, changed law firms, moving from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP (“Cadwalader”) to Greenberg Traurig (“GT”). Until Solomon and LazarofPs move, GT represented Defendant Hasbro in a number of patent applications and was actively seeking to expand its representation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. James J. Kevlik v. David B. Goldstein, Town of DerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. John Borges v. Our Lady of the Sea Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Merck Eprova AG v. ProThera, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Picker International, Inc. v. Varian Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  5. Stratagem Development Corp. v. Heron International N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altova GMBH v. Syncro Soft SRLDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Altova GmbH v. Syncro Soft SRLDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
  3. Boudreau v. PetitDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API