State v. Lawing
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
Defendant assigns error to much of the evidence introduced by the State at the trial. We have examined the evidence, and defendant’s assignments of error thereto are overruled.
Defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment filed herein is denied. The bill of indictment in this case is sufficient and is distinguishable from the bill of indictment in the case of State v. Able, 11 N.C. App. 141, 180 S.E. 2d 333 (1971).
Defendant assigns as error the discrepancy between the pronouncement in open court that defendant be imprisoned for six years and the written judgment signed by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AbleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MorstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. MorstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. MIRJAHCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025