Legal Opinion

State v. Greer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1982No. 8125SC923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant’s only assignment of error is the denial of his motion to dismiss. At trial, defendant did not move to quash the indictment nor did defendant otherwise challenge the sufficiency of the indictment. Defendant did not argue the sufficiency of the indictment on appeal. Despite these circumstances, the bill of indict*706ment, upon which the prosecution is based, is before us as a part of the record proper, and we are charged with notice of its contents. State v. Able, 11 N.C. App. 141, 180 S.E. 2d 333 (1971). If the bill of indictment is insufficient on its face to state a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative OfficeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. AbleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API