Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Stinson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 21, 1992No. 66,484; ACM 28863PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

Appellant was charged with three specifications of rape and three specifications of committing indecent acts with a female under 16 years of age, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920 and 934, respectively. The victim of all offenses was appellant’s 9-year-old daughter. Before a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, he pleaded not guilty to the rape specifications but guilty to the lesser-included offenses of carnal knowledge, and guilty to committing the indecent acts. The military judge found him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. MustafaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. LewisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. HammondUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. McElhaneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  5. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API