Legal Opinion
State v. Crooks
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 25, 1987No. 38053; CA A35935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for selling an unregistered security in violation of ORS 59.055. He asserts that the security which he sold was exempt from registration requirements under ORS 59.025 and that the transaction was exempt under ORS 59.035. In addition, he argues that the court unconstitutionally placed the burden on him to prove the availability of the exemptions and objects to an award of restitution to the purchasers of the security. We affirm.
Defendant was engaged in the business of buying and selling real estate security instruments in the Bend area. In some instances he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. DempsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Karsun v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. SheetsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. KershnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- State v. RibadeneiraCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- WesBanco Bank Barnesville v. Rafoth (In re Baker & Getty Financial Services, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- State v. GruverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.