Legal Opinion
State v. Kershner
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided November 21, 1990No. 64,500PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J.:
Defendant Gary Kershner appeals from two convictions of engaging in business as a broker-dealer without being registered (K.S.A. 17-1254[a]) and two convictions of selling or offering for sale unregistered securities (K.S.A. 17-1255).
We affirm.
Kershner ran the business activities of Amhawk, Inc., a Kansas corporation which sold seasonings and distributorships. Kershner was involved in the sale of Amhawk securities. Amhawk incurred rather heavy indebtedness, so Kershner decided to organize a new corporation called Country Kettle in order to have a clean corporation from which to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- People v. DempsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CasperTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Trivectra v. UshijimaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re KershnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- State v. RibadeneiraCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.