Legal Opinion

Karsun v. Kelley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1971PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action under the Oregon Blue Sky Law (ORS 59.115) by the purchaser of stock to recover the amount of the purchase price from the sellers of the stock. Plaintiff appeals from an order by the trial court setting aside a jury verdict of $3,750, plus $1,085 in attorney’s fees, and granting a new trial.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the admission of evidence of other false representations, similar to those alleged to have been made to defendant, but made to two other purchasers of stock at about the same time, was error requiring the granting of a new trial. The pleadings and facts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. KristichOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Menefee v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API