Legal Opinion

State v. Tessnear

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1965No. 8PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

The State’s evidence was sufficient to overrule defendant’s motions of nonsuit. State v. Ryals, 244 N.C. 75, 92 S.E. 2d 443; State v. Harrison, 239 N.C. 659, 80 S.E. 2d 481; State v. Avery, 236 N.C. 276, 72 S.E. 2d 670. He is, however, entitled to a new trial for the error he assigns in the charge. The possession of any quantity of non-taxpaid liquor is, without exception, unlawful and, under G.S. 18-11, such possession is pnma facie evidence that such liquor is kept for the purpose of being sold. State v. Guffey, 252 N.C. 60, 112 S.E. 2d 734; State v. Hill, 236 N.C. 704, 73 S.E. 2d 894.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. . NanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WeldonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. LigonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API