State v. Sanders
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
After reviewing defendant’s assignments of error, we have concluded that there was prejudicial error in the trial below; thus, defendant must be afforded a new trial. We initially discuss several of defendant’s contentions which are without merit but likely to be raised on retrial.
It is argued that the trial court erred in admitting testimony that defendant had been taken into custody approximately two weeks before the killing and had threatened to kill Sergeant Lambert after being slapped by him during an encounter at the Law Enforcement Center following that arrest.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Davis v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MoreiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.