State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
In North Carolina, the “general rule is that in a criminal prosecution evidence of the reputation of a place or neighborhood is ordinarily inadmissible hearsay.” State v. Weldon, 314 N.C. 401, 408, 333 S.E.2d 701, 705 (1985). In this case, the trial court erroneously allowed testimony indicating Defendant was in a neighborhood known as an “open air market for drugs.” Because we conclude that had this error not been committed, there is a reasonable possibility that a different result would have been reached at trial, we grant Defendant a new trial.
The underlying facts tend to show…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CreasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WeldonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. . ChisenhallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HardyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. BivensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. HanifCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.