State v. Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaRHHill, J.
There is no statutory limit upon the quantity of legally acquired liquor, upon which the taxes imposed by law have been paid, a person may lawfully have or keep in his private dwelling, while the same is occupied and used by him as his dwelling only, for the “family use” purposes prescribed in G.S. 18-11. S. v. Barnhardt, 230 N.C. 223, 52 S.E. 2d 904; S. v. Brady, ante, 295.
Yet in a prosecution for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, proof of the possession by the accused of more than one gallon of bonded or tax-paid liquor, even within his private…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. FuquaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. . SuddrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.