Legal Opinion
Price-Hanson v. Pare
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 27, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
This is the second Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A, Rule 8A appeal by the plaintiffs of the same interlocutory ruling; to wit, the denial of their motion for summary judgment. The defendants have appropriately filed a motion to dismiss this second premature appeal, and we hereby allow said motion.
There can obviously be no dispute that the denial of the plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion constituted an interlocutory ruling. Panesis v. Loyal Protective Life Ins. Co., 5 Mass. App. Ct. 66, 76 (1977); Seigal v. Fitz Taxi, Inc., 1986 Mass. App. Div. 42, 43 (1986); Bohlin v. Camille, 1982 Mass. App. Div.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Gibbs Ford, Inc. v. United Truck Leasing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Cappadona v. Riverside 400 Function Room, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Georgantis v. Star Market CompaniesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Massey v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Hoch v. PorrazzoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
- Ajalat v. CohanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Melo v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.