Legal Opinion
Ajalat v. Cohan
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided December 14, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.
This is an action by the purchasers of a home to recover against the sellers for their alleged misrepresentations concerning a septic system. Defendants Greg A. and Jill Cohan (the “Sellers”) have appealed the grant of summary judgment on liability in favor of plaintiffs Farris and Dorothy Ajalat (the “Buyers”). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving parties, the Sellers. Tetrault v. Mahoney, Hawkes & Goldings, 425 Mass. 456, 459 (1997).
In early 1994, the Sellers decided to sell their home at 2 Pilgrim Road in Hamilton to buy a larger home. They had previously lost…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Blare v. Husky Injection Molding Systems Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Godbout v. CousensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aden v. LudvigsenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Carleton v. TimponeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Corporate Design Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Thomas Ford Sales, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Coughlin v. GascombeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Pike v. Empire Insurance GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.