Legal Opinion

Melo v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 18, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A., Rule 5, report by the trial judge of his interlocutory ruling denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. G.L.c. 231, §108. See generally Price-Hanson v. Pare, 1997 Mass. App. Div. 101, 102; Goldman v. Peterson, 1997 Mass. App. Div. 189 n.2.

The defendants’ motion sought summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations applicable to tort actions (G.L.c. 260, §2A). The report brings before us the interplay between statutes of limitations and the statute establishing the one-trial system…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Board of Assessors v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Price-Hanson v. PareMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Committee for Public Counsel Services v. LooknerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. KucmasMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
  2. Velardi v. GivensMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API