Melo v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A., Rule 5, report by the trial judge of his interlocutory ruling denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. G.L.c. 231, §108. See generally Price-Hanson v. Pare, 1997 Mass. App. Div. 101, 102; Goldman v. Peterson, 1997 Mass. App. Div. 189 n.2.
The defendants’ motion sought summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations applicable to tort actions (G.L.c. 260, §2A). The report brings before us the interplay between statutes of limitations and the statute establishing the one-trial system…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Board of Assessors v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Price-Hanson v. PareMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
- Committee for Public Counsel Services v. LooknerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitchell v. KucmasMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
- Velardi v. GivensMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005