Legal Opinion
Hoch v. Porrazzo
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 1, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
Plaintiff Jonathan Hoch (“Hoch”), the homeowner, brought this action to recover for Armand J. Porrazzo’s (“Porrazzo”) alleged intentional misrepresentations, unfair and deceptive practices in violation of G.L.c. 93A, and breach of warranty in dumping illegal fill onto Hoch’s property. Porrazzo is a corporate officer of A.J.P. Construction, Inc. (“AJP”) with which Hoch had contracted for a septic system installation and landscaping work. The trial court allowed Por-razzo’s Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 12(b)(6), motion to dismiss Hoch’s complaint, and this appeal followed.
1. Porrazzo contends that res…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. Execuquest Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Community Builders, Inc. v. Indian Motocycle Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Standard Register Co. v. Bolton-Emerson, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Marshall v. Stratus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Soderlund v. MosherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Doyle v. BaltaksMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Tropical Banana Co. v. Joshua Tree, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- A.J.P. Contractors, Inc. v. HochMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Fairfield Equine Associates PC v. SafranMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.