Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Surtshin
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 9, 2008No. Case C 03-3676 RMW (PR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
On August 7, 2003, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Napa State Hospital and its staff concerning the conditions of his confinement. Plaintiff has filed a motion to amend, appoint counsel, certify class, and hold pro se pleadings to a less stringent standard (docket no. 76); motion for the court to provide the plaintiff price of copies (docket no. 77); motion for permission to add defendants or accept pleading as a separate claim/complaint (docket no. 79); motion for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- (PC) Spencer v. Pulido-EsparzaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Aaron Justin Fulk v. John Does 1-3District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Guerrero v. SoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Odanga v. JordarDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Ramachandran v. City of Los AltosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.