Legal Opinion
Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 20, 2020No. 5:18-cv-01223Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 18-cv-01223-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED 11 CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 126 13 14 Plaintiff Satish Ramachandran sues defendants City of Los Altos (“Los Altos”) and 15 individual Los Altos employees for violation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights 16 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 92. Mr. Ramachandran now seeks leave to file…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.