Legal Opinion

(PC) Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 10, 2023No. 1:20-cv-01176Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD B. SPENCER, 1:20-cv-01176-JLT-GSA-PC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND 12 RECOMMENDATIONS ISSUED ON APRIL v. 7, 2023 13 14 PULIDO-ESPARZA, et al., ( ECF No. 15.) 15 Defendants. AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 16 RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND BE 17 DENIED, THAT THIS CASE PROCEED WITH THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 AGAINST DEFENDANT CDCR FOR VIOLATION OF THE ADA, AND THAT ALL 19 OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 20 (ECF No. 17.) 21…

2Cases cited108 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API