Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 22, 2010No. 10-0020/AFPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred by accepting Appellant’s guilty plea to indecent exposure. We hold that there is no substantial basis in law or fact to question Appellant’s plea to indecent exposure and affirm the judgment of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA).

I

Appellant communicated over the Internet from his on-base dormitory room with a civilian police officer posing as a fourteen-year-old boy using the screen name bradnhl4. During their first online conversation, Appellant described…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. FairclothCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. UriosteguiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  2. United States v. Specialist CEY BRISTOL J. WILLIAMSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  3. United States v. BrondeauNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  4. United States v. CaldwellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
  5. United States v. Flores-RivasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API