Legal Opinion
United States v. Specialist CEY BRISTOL J. WILLIAMS
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided March 30, 2016No. ARMY 20140401PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAMPANELLA Judge:
A panel consisting of officer and enlisted members sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of wrongful sexual contact, seven specifications of indecent exposure, one specification of abusive sexual contact, and one specification of indecent language, in violation of Articles 120,120e, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 920c, 934 (2006 & 2012) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The panel sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for nine months, forfeiture of all pay…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. UriosteguiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. MohammadSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2019
- United States v. Private E2 NICHOLAS E. DAVISArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. Private First Class JOHN A. HAYESArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. Specialist DAKOTA A. BRAGANArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017