United States v. Caldwell
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge PERLAK,
joined by Judge PAYTON-O’BRIEN, (concurring in part and dissenting in part):
I respectfully dissent from so much of the majority opinion as affirms the finding of guilty for the charge and specification under Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921, larceny.
We review a military judge’s decision to accept a guilty plea for an abuse of discretion and questions of law arising from the guilty plea de novo. If there is a substantial basis in either law or fact for questioning the plea, then we may set aside a finding of guilty based on the plea. United States v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010