Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. American Trading Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1925No. Docket No. 5212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This is plaintiffs’ appeal from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order and refusing to grant an injunction pendente lite. On December 20, 1921, defendant La Zacualpa-Hidalgo Rubber Co., a corporation, entered into a written agreement with defendant American Trading Company, a corporation, whereby said Rubber Company agreed, in part, that if within a period of eighteen months thereafter an indebtedness owing to said Trading Company, amounting to a sum not less than $167,823.46 nor more than #205,671.34, was not liquidated, said Rubber Company would cause to be transferred to said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McDonald v. HuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Watson v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Shaw v. Hollister Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hot Springs Coal Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Hamud v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Klopot v. NorthrupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Doggett v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API