Baldwin v. American Trading Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
This is plaintiffs’ appeal from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order and refusing to grant an injunction pendente lite. On December 20, 1921, defendant La Zacualpa-Hidalgo Rubber Co., a corporation, entered into a written agreement with defendant American Trading Company, a corporation, whereby said Rubber Company agreed, in part, that if within a period of eighteen months thereafter an indebtedness owing to said Trading Company, amounting to a sum not less than $167,823.46 nor more than #205,671.34, was not liquidated, said Rubber Company would cause to be transferred to said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- McDonald v. HuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Watson v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Shaw v. Hollister Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hot Springs Coal Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Hamud v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Klopot v. NorthrupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Doggett v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.