Legal Opinion

Hamud v. Hawthorne

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1959No. L. A. 25335PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in this suit to have a quitclaim deed declared to be a mortgage; for surrender and cancellation of a note, third deed of trust, and the quitclaim deed; for “Redemption . . . and for Reconveyance” of the property covered by the deed; and for an accounting. Defendants appeal also from an ex parte order of June 12, 1957, entered subsequent to the judgment, authorizing plaintiffs to deposit with the court clerk a certain sum of money for the benefit of defendants, as a condition of redeeming the property. Plaintiffs appeal from the portion of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McDonald v. HuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. BirkelundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Watson v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Martin v. KehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Clontz v. FortnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Protopappas v. ProtopappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Wachovia Bank v. LIFETIME INDUSTRIES, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API