Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Hollister Land & Improvement Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1913No. S.F. No. 6134PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment in the court below in favor of the defendants. Upon the trial, the Hon. M. T. Dooling, then judge of the superior court, delivered an opinion covering the questions involved upon this appeal. The discussion of the points involved in that opinion is satisfactory to us, and we adopt the portions thereof relating to the points on appeal as the opinion of this court. They are as follows:

“This action involves the validity of a sale, and the deeds made pursuant thereto by the defendant Hollister Land and Improvement Company, a corporation, to…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Klopot v. NorthrupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Friedrichs v. FriedrichsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Piedmont Publishing Co. v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Baldwin v. American Trading Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API