Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Tatung
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 26, 2021No. 14ag/20PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Celestine Tatung, Miscellaneous Docket AG No. 14, September Term, 2020, Opinion by Booth, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – CHOICE OF LAW - DISMISSAL This attorney grievance matter involves an attorney who made a handful of careless mistakes in connection with his representation of two clients seeking asylum in a federal immigration proceeding in Texas. The attorney objected to the charges on the ground that, under the choice of law provisions set forth in the Maryland Attorneys Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) 19-308.5(b), the Attorney…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- General Motors Corp. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Gadda v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.