Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Malone
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 31, 2022No. 47ag/20PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Edward Allen Malone, Misc. Docket AG No. 47, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Biran, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – MISCONDUCT – APPLICATION OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION – LIMITED REMAND – Respondent, Edward Allen Malone, was charged with violating Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC”) 8.1(a) and (b) (bar admission and disciplinary matters) and 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d) (misconduct). In pretrial discovery, Mr. Malone asserted the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in response to two of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Ivan Melchor Moreno and Rigoberto Melchor MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Phillips v. ChangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023