De Watteville v. Sims
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Action by B. C. Sims against Charles De Watteville and others on a note to foreclose a mortgage lien.' Judgment for plaintiff and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs in error will be designated as defendants (except when Charles and Mary De Watteville, against whom judgment was taken by default, may be designated as mortgagors, or the other plaintiffs in error, who were not parties to the note or mortgage, may be designated as resisting defendants), and the defendant in error will be designated as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court. The essential facts, when not stated, are necessarily presupposed by this opinion, and will therefore be understood.
In the absence of exceptional facts — such as the invalidity or…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Whitney v. WenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Keokuk & Western Railroad v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smith v. KernochenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Dull v. BlackmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. CoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Queenan v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Cox v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.