First Southwestern Financial Services v. Sessions
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
First Southwestern Financial Services (“FSFS”) appeals from two district court orders awarding Ronald, Scott, and Donna Sessions (the “Sessions”) costs and reasonable attorney fees based upon the court’s conclusion that the Sessions were “the prevailing party” under section 57-1-32 of the Utah Code. We reverse and remand for proceedings in accord with this opinion.
The material facts are not in dispute. In 1983, the Sessions jointly executed a promis sory note in exchange for a $33,336.97 loan from FSFS. 1 As security, the Sessions presented FSFS with a deed of trust in real…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fayette County National Bank v. LillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Buzas Baseball, Inc. v. Salt Lake Trappers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Bilanzich v. LonettiUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Salmon v. Davis CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Zoll & Branch, P.C. v. AsayUtah Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.