Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Barba Lou, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1982No. 81-344PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

I

This action was filed more than two years from the date plaintiff’s cause of action accrued. Thus it is barred by R. C. 2305.10, the statute of limitations, unless it comes within the scope of R. C. 2305.19, the savings statute, or some other exception. R. C. 2305.19 provides, in part:

“In an action commenced * * * if the plaintiff fails otherwise than upon the merits, and the time limited for the commencement of such action at the date of * * * failure has expired, the plaintiff * * * may commence a new action within one year after such date. * * * ” (Emphasis added.)

Appellant herein…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cash v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McWhirt v. MckeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Beckner v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Palmer v. RuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Harrison v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Goudlock v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API