County of Sacramento v. Glann
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the' county of Sacramento condemning certain land for a public highway. The land is located partly in the S. E. ¼ of section 9 and partly in the S. W. ¼ of section 10, T. 5 N., R. 5 E., M. D. M. The said S. E. ¼ was owned by Peter Glann, the estate of Vincent Glann, deceased, and the estate of Daniel Glann, deceased, in equal undivided shares, and the S. W. ¼ belonged to the said estates in equal shares. The action was brought against Peter Glann, individually, and in his representative capacity as executor of each of said estates. The judgment awards…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Humboldt Cty. v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In re Grove StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Tehama County v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Levee Dist. No. 9 v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mulville v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Bagg v. WickizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- County of San Diego v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955