Shoop v. Kittitas County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
The Legislature has recently manifested its intent that RCW 36.01.050 should be construed as a venue statute. Therefore, when a plaintiff commences suit against a county in the superior court of a county not designated in RCW 36.01.050, the suit need not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse the order of dismissal and remand for transfer to a proper county under the change of venue statute.
The statute at issue, RCW 36.01.050, was first adopted in 1963. Until 1997, it provided that an action against a county could be commenced in an adjoining county: “All actions…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Marriage of McDermottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Smale v. NoretepCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Smale v. NoretepCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.