Legal Opinion
Smale v. Noretep
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 1, 2009No. 62349-4-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
208 P.3d 1180 (2009)
Karl O. SMALE and Heather Smale, Respondents,
v.
NORETEP, a Washington State general partnership; Ronald Schultz and Jane Doe Schultz; Peter J. Poeschel and Jane Doe Poeschel; Defendants, and
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Appellant.
No. 62349-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 1, 2009.
Brian Collins, Tumwater, WA, Rob Smith, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Gregory Gilday, Stanwood, WA, for Respondents.
AGID, J.
¶ 1 The Smales sought to quiet title to property they claimed they had acquired through adverse possession and named Noretep, the original non-Indian owners,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DickertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lundgren v. Upper Skagit Indian TribeWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Tolliver v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- State v. DickertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.