Shoop v. Kittitas County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
65 P.3d 1194 (2003)
149 Wash.2d 29
Cathleen L. SHOOP and Ken Shoop, husband and wife, Respondents,
v.
KITTITAS COUNTY and John Does I-IV, Petitioners.
No. 71926-8.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued September 19, 2002.
Decided April 3, 2003.
Charles Bailey, Gretchen Salazar, Seattle, for Petitioners.
Lopez & Fantel, Carl Lopez, Seattle, for Respondents.
SANDERS, J.
Former RCW 36.01.050 (1997), amended by Laws of 2000, ch. 244, § 1, requires actions against a county be commenced in the defendant county or one of the two nearest counties. This case arises because the plaintiff filed her tort…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Yousoufian v. Office of Ron SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Young v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Young v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.