Legal Opinion

Smale v. Noretep

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 1, 2009No. 62349-4-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

¶1 The Smales sought to quiet title to property they claimed they had acquired through adverse pos*477session and named Noretep, the original non-Indian owners, as defendants. After the Smales sued, Noretep deeded the disputed property to the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians (Tribe), and the Smales named the Tribe as a defendant. In its unsuccessful motion to dismiss, the Tribe claimed that tribal sovereign immunity deprived the superior court of subject matter jurisdiction. Because courts exercise in rem jurisdiction over property subject to quiet title actions, our Supreme Court has held that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lundgren v. Upper Skagit Indian TribeWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Tolliver v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  3. Flying T Ranch, Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of IndiansWashington Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Flying T Ranch, Inc., V. Stillaguamish Tribe Of IndiansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  5. Flying T Ranch, Inc., V. Stillaguamish Tribe Of IndiansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API